Product
Constitutional Intelligence
Identify constitutional issues in the record — search and seizure, Miranda, due process, Brady — with citations back to the facts and the doctrine.
What it does
Constitutional Intelligence scans the record for facts that implicate constitutional doctrine and drafts an initial analysis for attorney review. It cites both the facts that triggered the issue and the doctrinal framework applied.
How it works
- 1Step 1Facts are matched against pattern libraries for common constitutional issues (Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Fourteenth Amendment; Brady/Giglio; equal protection).
- 2Step 2Each identified issue is drafted with the triggering facts and doctrinal citations.
- 3Step 3Attorney review is required before any output is used in a filing.
Evidence gate
Every intelligence engine writes through an evidence gate that suppresses ungrounded output. Nothing reaches a report unless it can be traced to a passage in your corpus.
Benefits
Catch constitutional issues you might overlook in a large record.
See the fact pattern and the doctrine side-by-side.
Foundation for a motion to suppress or §1983 complaint.
Typical workflow
- 1Analyze the caseEnsure Evidence Intelligence has run.
- 2Open the Constitutional panelIssues are grouped by amendment and severity.
- 3Draft a motionExport an issue as the seed of a motion draft.
Examples
Criminal Defense
Fourth Amendment analysis of a warrantless vehicle search and Fifth Amendment analysis of a post-invocation interrogation.
Civil Rights
Excessive force and municipal liability analysis under §1983.
Best practices
- Feed the constitutional output into Motion Intelligence to draft a suppression motion grounded in the same facts.
- Attach body-cam transcripts and dispatch audio when available — they materially change the analysis.
- Use the exported issue list as a checklist during a preservation motion, not as a finished brief.
Attorney responsibilities
Attorney in control
Nyrava proposes. Attorneys decide. Every output must be reviewed by qualified counsel before use.
- Verify every doctrinal citation against controlling authority in your jurisdiction.
- Confirm the fact pattern the model relied on before advancing it.
- Decide whether raising a constitutional issue is strategically appropriate.
Common scenarios
Motion to suppress prep
Chain from Constitutional Intelligence to Motion Intelligence to produce a first draft with facts and authorities aligned.
§1983 complaint drafting
Use identified excessive-force and municipal-liability issues as the seed for a complaint outline.
Platform limitations
- Pattern libraries reflect federal doctrine plus commonly litigated state variants; niche state rules may need manual expansion.
- The model does not evaluate procedural bars (waiver, preservation) automatically.
Frequently asked questions
Related documentation