What if two documents disagree on a date?

The disagreement becomes a contradiction entry rather than a silent choice, with both sources cited.

Can I edit the timeline?

Yes. Attorney edits are preserved and marked so the source-derived version is never overwritten silently.

Product

Timeline Intelligence

Reconstruct the case timeline automatically from the record, with every event cited to its source.

What it does

Timeline Intelligence assembles a chronological view of the matter from the extracted evidence. Each event carries the date, the actors involved, and citations back to the document(s) that placed it there. Conflicting dates across sources are flagged as contradictions rather than silently resolved.

How it works

1
Step 1
Extracted events and statements from Evidence Intelligence are normalized to ISO dates where possible.
2
Step 2
Events are clustered by subject, actor, and location.
3
Step 3
Date conflicts between sources are surfaced as contradictions instead of being averaged away.
4
Step 4
The timeline can be filtered by actor, document, or subject and exported to PDF for court binders.

Evidence gate

Every intelligence engine writes through an evidence gate that suppresses ungrounded output. Nothing reaches a report unless it can be traced to a passage in your corpus.

Benefits

See the case chronology at a glance.

Every date is cited — nothing is invented.

Conflicting timelines across witnesses become visible immediately.

Typical workflow

1
Run Evidence Intelligence first
The timeline is projected from grounded evidence.
2
Open the Timeline panel
The chronological view is generated automatically.
3
Filter and export
Filter by actor or subject; export a court-ready PDF.

Examples

Medical Malpractice

Assemble a minute-by-minute ED timeline from records, RCA memo, and expert affidavit.

Appellate

Reconstruct procedural history across briefs and transcripts for the fact section of an opening brief.

Best practices

Include ambient documents (calendars, delivery logs, sign-in sheets) — they anchor dates that testimony alone leaves ambiguous.
Review contradictions early; an unresolved date conflict often signals an impeachment opportunity.
Export the filtered view rather than the full timeline when preparing a specific hearing.

Attorney responsibilities

Attorney in control

Nyrava proposes. Attorneys decide. Every output must be reviewed by qualified counsel before use.

Confirm the date each event resolved to matches the source.
Decide whether a conflict is a genuine dispute, a transcription error, or a witness memory issue.
Retain edited timelines under the workspace's normal work-product controls.

Common scenarios

Deposition prep

Export a witness-filtered timeline before cross-examination to see every date that witness placed on the record.

Sequencing argument

Use the exported chronology as the factual backbone of a summary-judgment brief.

Platform limitations

Approximate dates ("early April") are placed heuristically and flagged as low-confidence.
Time zones in raw records are treated as-written unless a document declares otherwise.

Frequently asked questions

Witness Intelligence